## table Samuel said that 16:36 was equivalent to 72:32. What was Samuel’s error? 1) The ratio was not chosen fro

Question

table

Samuel said that 16:36 was equivalent to 72:32.

What was Samuel’s error?

1) The ratio was not chosen from the same columns.

2) He did not look at the correct rows.

3) This problem was impossible. 16:36 has no equivalent ratios.

4) The first and second terms for both ratios need to be in the same order.

HURRY PLEASE

in progress
0

Math
21 mins
2021-10-14T03:52:31+00:00
2021-10-14T03:52:31+00:00 2 Answers
0
## Answers ( )

Answer:the 4th option is correctStep-by-step explanation:4) The first and second terms for both ratios need to be in the same order.Step-by-step explanation:Given ratio is:

16:36

In order to find any ratio equivalent to given ratio, the ratio can be divided by a number or multiplied to a number.

The equivalent ratio that is given: 72:32

If we multiply the given ratio by 2: We get 32:72

So,

Looking at the options we can conclude that the right answer is

4) The first and second terms for both ratios need to be in the same order.Keywords:Ratio, FractionsLearn more about ratios at:#LearnwithBrainly